Interesting data from Hitwise, ranking the top political websites in terms of market share:
Rank Website Market Share
1. www.huffingtonpost.com 8.55%
2. www.realclearpolitics.com 6.26%
3. www.politico.com 4.9%
4. www.barackobama.com 4.53%
5. elections.foxnews.com 4.24%
6. www.freerepublic.com 3.44%
7. politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com 3.33%
8. www.dailykos.com 3.24%
9. www.johnmccain.com 2.23%
10. www.townhall.com 1.92%
There are a few things that strike me about this list:
# 1. Huffington Post (left-leaning) has more than twice the market-share of Fox News (right leaning), just as Barack Obama's website has more than twice the market share of John McCain's. In fact, let's lump right-leaning, left-leaning, and neutral sites and see how market share shakes out:
- Left leaning (Huff Po, Politico, Barack Obama, and Daily Kos) = 21.22% market share combined
- Right-leaning ((Fox, Free Republic, John McCain, and Town Hall) = 12.01% market share combined
- Neutral sites (Forbes' Real Clear Politics and CNN's Political Ticker) = 9.59% market share combined
It's a well-known fact that the population of internet users skews younger than the population at large, as does the Democratic party. So is this huge disparity attributable just to the fact that there are more Democrats than Republicans turning to the internet for info?
The right wing has totally dominated the radio space, but these stats make me think that the left wing is starting to dominate the online space. The future is online, not radio, and so Rove and company are going to have to try and figure out how to compete better online.
#2. Obama beats McCain 2:1. Other studies have shown that Obama takes better advantage of the web channel than McCain, but in an era of close elections, can one party afford to surrender so much market share in such a critical channel? And what can they do about it at this late date?
#3. Only two of the top 10 sites are affiliated with major traditional media outlets: CNN's Political Ticker and Real Clear Politics, which is owned by Forbes. (full disclosure: Forbes is a client of ours, and we are running satisfaction surveys on RealClearPolitics). Why are none of the other networks or major national print media outlets on this list? I think it goes back to what we've seen in the annual ACSI ratings of news and information sites like ABCNews.com, USAToday.com, MSNBC.com, and NYTimes.com. For many years in a row now, none of these sites have been able to significantly differentiate themselves from one another.
In addition the domination by sites with a clearly partisan voice makes me think that people are looking to political websites with a viewpoint they already hold, rather than a neutral one.
#4. Hitwise also has some interesting data on what political issue search terms led people to each candidate's website. For McCain, the top search terms leading to his website were: Healthcare, Environment/Global Warming, Oil Prices, Education, Immigration, in that order. For Obama, the top search terms leading to his website were: Abortion, Education, Environment/Global Warming, Healthcare, and Immigration.
However, the majority of people went to Obama's site looking for biographical info, vs. going to McCain's site to get his position on the issues.
This behavioral data gives us some interesting peeks into the role the internet is playing during these campaigns. But I don't see anyone that is too comfortable making predictions based on this data.
Funny, how is it that I've never even seen the top website: Huffington Post?? Will check it out now! I'm very familiar with the rest. I mainly use a site that links to political sites... www.repolitical.com. It links to the top political news of day. Thanks for new site!
Posted by: Mike | November 15, 2009 at 07:19 PM
Most of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the 20th century has been caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, which result from human activity such as the burning of fossil fuel and deforestation
Posted by: investment costa rica | September 09, 2010 at 05:10 PM
i love you post
Posted by: UGG Shoes | November 11, 2010 at 09:29 PM
*Perhaps you should go on a tour.
Posted by: christian louboutin shoes | November 15, 2010 at 12:56 AM
Reported that the recent presence of United Nations special envoy in India, yiwu fair Sikhs Puri Airport in Houston, wholesale Texas in the United States in transit, stock shoes for religious reasons refused to take off his head while being detained and forced header search.
Posted by: wholesale shoe | December 14, 2010 at 01:40 AM
*People enjoy the characters are not happy.
Posted by: Air Jordan Shoes | December 18, 2010 at 01:03 AM
Love,love love this post!O(∩_∩)O~
Posted by: Jordan Big Fund | January 13, 2011 at 02:55 AM
* be happy together is good enough. I am not asking for things that I could never get.
Posted by: taobao mall | January 18, 2011 at 03:54 AM
Thanks for taking this opportunity to discuss this, I feel fervently about this and I like learning about this subject.
Posted by: Home Decor | March 10, 2011 at 07:50 PM
Very good article and interesting. I hope to write something like this every day.
Posted by: order cigarettes | April 27, 2011 at 08:47 AM
It's great to hear from you and see what you've been up to. In your blog I feel your enthusiasm for life. thank you.
Posted by: red bottom | October 04, 2011 at 04:34 PM
Thanks, I'm going to have nightmares tonight.
Posted by: Moncler Jackets Kids | October 09, 2011 at 08:49 AM
I like the writing structure of your blog and it does a pretty decent job of presenting the material.
Posted by: North Face Denali Jackets | November 11, 2011 at 09:46 AM
Set your own life easier take the personal loans and everything you want.
Posted by: JennaRush | December 21, 2011 at 12:49 AM
So cute! I already like you on FB and also get your posts on Google Reader. :)
Posted by: Belstaff outlets | January 07, 2012 at 04:18 PM