The Inaugural ForeSee Results E-Government Transparency Index

Today we released our inaugural E-Government Transparency Index. You can download the report for free on our website and read about it on NextGov. I'll share the results first and then explain a bit of the background. These are all Transparency scores, calculated on a 100-point scale. We're starting with 14 federal government websites, so this is far from representative of the whole government, and there are certainly sites out there with slightly higher and much lower transparency. But this study does represent more than 30,000 citizen surveys, which is nothing to sneeze at.

In the Next Gov article, GSA's Dave McClure said, "We have always assumed that greater transparency [and] more openness in government would link to greater satisfaction and higher trust in government. What this study does is help confirm that."

 

 Lots more details in the full report, which you can download for free on our website.

Now, a little more background on what we're measuring and why.

When President Obama released his memo last February about transparency and open government, we immediately got to work. We were already measuring online customer satisfaction with more than 200 federal websites, and our researchers thought there might be a way to adapt our methodology to measure the President's transparency goals in an accurate, precise, actionable manner. If we could do it, it would give agencies a way to measure their performance on these objectives. After all, as I have been known to say maybe once or twice in my career (or in the last 5 minutes), you can't manage what you don't measure. Agencies cannot manage, maintain, or improve transparency, communication, collaboration, or trust without a quantifiable measure of these objectives.

For months, we worked on models and tested them. We were already measuring dozens of drivers, or elements of satisfaction (such as navigation, search, content, look and feel, etc), and we had a theory that online transparency was another one. Citizens who perceive a website as more transparent are going to be more satisfied. Satisfaction as measured by the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) has been sown again and again to predict certain future behaviors such as likelihood to use the website as a primary channel instead of other, more costly channels; likelihood to recommend, likelihood to return to the website, etc. So we wanted to see if it was also true that satisfaction predicted likelihood to communicate and collaborate with a given agency, and we wanted to see if satisfaction predicted trust in the agency. These were all the key elements laid out in the Obama memo.

After three months of testing the models, we implemented the new methodology on e-gov sites that volunteered to be part of our research, and then we tested some more. We tweaked, we adjusted, and in July, we published our first report, showing conclusively that transparency was a key driver of satisfaction (in fact, for most agencies but not all, it was the most important driver of satisfaction) and that satisfaction, in turn, predicted trust).

Meanwhile, the buzz about our research grew, and agencies were signing up left and right to deploy the new model on their site. The new model measured all the old things that agencies have been measuring online with us for 10 years, it just added these new elements so that agencies could evaluate their success on these open government initiatives and report their success if they choose.

The E-Government Transparency Index

We decided to publish a report with scores for the 14 sites that had enough data collected by the end of December. We have high standards for data collection, so while many more sites are measuring transparency, only 14 had a big enough sample by the end of the year. Voila, The E-Gov Tranparency Index. Kudos to all that let us publish their scores, and we are looking forward to seeing the Index grow and expand in the coming year.

Just in time!

Last December, the White House and OMB released another memo setting an aggressive time line for agencies to be more open and solicit public opinions. Those of you who have the new model implemented on your site should be well on your way to quantifying how transparent your website is with ACSI-modeled scores for trust and transparency, which are benchmarkable across agencies. Those of you who don't have the new model implemented, just contact your SRA and they can fix you up. Those of you who are not currently running the ACSI survey online can contact dave.lewan@foreseeresults.com and we'll help you out.

So what do you think? Any surprises? Who would you like to see included in the Transparency Index next time?

Comments

[jacksmith]

This is nice blog. These are all Transparency scores, calculated on a 100-point scale. We're starting with 14 federal government websites, so this is far from representative of the whole government, and there are certainly sites out there with slightly higher and much lower transparency. But this study does represent more than 30,000 citizen surveys, which is nothing to sneeze at.
jacksmith
thanks
......................

[Vimax]

It was the best important disciplinarian of satisfaction and that satisfaction, in turn, predicted trust.

[Jordan Shoes]

The article from your blog is quite wonderful and let me remind of some questions about the society veritably.

[Supra Shoes]

Don't cry when something is over, smile when something is happened. Don't give up, you are always the unique one. Just believe yourself.

[hear]

As we all know the original Juicy handbags in the market is very expensive, we will very angry and unhappy. In case of this thing happen we must learn some methods to indentify which is original and fake.
Each Juicy Couture clothing products and fashion handbags are prepared in the U.S. What this means, is that if you recognise a product on a handbag that is featured in a Chinese set site, you can bet it’s an imitation. It won't matter what is declared, it just isn't economically possible to pay to transport the genuine products offshore and then sell it at a discount rate.
Still; if you are in a spot where you can really hold and scrutinize the handbag there are few fundamental particulars that you can look for. For instance, the leather on a Juicy velour bags will be of the sheerest quality. It will be soft, narrow and slender and the polish on it should be matte not shiny.
All stitching on juicy velour bags is done by experts and must pass multiple stiff reviews. It will be flawless with nothing odd or inconsistent about it. If the handbag you are scrutinizing falls short on the sew works, even to a minimum, its a fake.
The inside lining on all juicy velour bags will be of fine cotton fabric. Not synthetic or any type of cotton fit. Likewise over again, the stitching will be errorless and there will be no extra threads or odd looking seems. Finally, keep in mind that certifications of legitimacy are on a regular basis faked and should never be regarded when evaluating the legitimacy of any designer product.

[coach handbags]

Have you ever thought about why we have multiplied out possessions,but reduced out values; we talk much,we love only a little,and we hate too much?

[Mens Prada Sunglasses]

Guess what, I own a sail boat today and I would leave tomorrow to sail around the world if my employment would allow it. I believe that Abby Sunderland is more competent for that task than I am today (and yes I’ve been on the ocean most of my life..
Our store offers you all kinds of favourite products like Prada Handbags and Prada Handbags 2010 , Mens Prada Sunglasses with high quality, fashion style and competitive price.

[Cody]

Have you ever thought about why we have multiplied out possessions,but reduced out values; we talk much,we love only a little,and we hate too much?
http://www.hotfilemediafire.com

[Nike Air Max 90]

You say:" global financial integration will suffer, but frankly should we care if that is the price for better regulation, more in line with national preferences and realities?" I am agree with your opinion. We should care about people and things around us. Even though the international economic how to change. Thanks you put this paper in your blog.

[Children Sandals]

Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view. Thank you for sharing. At the same time,i love Children Sandals very much .Welcome to look at my website and blog articles.Hope we can become good friends, and exchange and to help each other! Thanks!!

[Air force ones]

Pepole has many brieves,and my brief is getting better,if you want to support me,pls link my name and take some by yourself.thanks.

[wholesale lots]

I reduced out values..TK

[Peter Nicosia SEC]

Hello. Great job. I did not expect this on a Wednesday. This is a great story. Thanks!

[laser pointer]

I do something mistake.

[Skechers Shape Ups]

It is a pingback from one other web site..!.!. as that is getting to be additional normal (that is a superior matter!) I'll very likely seem to fixing the exhibit of it.

[male enhancement]

This blog really makes me impressed and attractive thanks to this blog I can get more knowledge from previous

[mac makeup]

I just like the approach you took with this subject. It isn’t every day that you discover something so concise and enlightening.