We've been studying satisfaction with online banking in the U.S. since 2003, and this year we did our first study of customer satisfaction with online banking in the UK. For this study, we did more than 1000 customer surveys of customers of the top 5 consumer-oriented retail banks in the UK: RBS, Lloyds, Barclays, HSBC, and Santander.
Despite 2+years of tumult in the global banking industry, customer satisfaction with online banking in the UK is fairly high, and customers are very satisfied with the top five banks (on aggregate they score 80 – generally considered the threshold for excellence on the study’s 100-point scale). Within the top five banks, the range of scores varied from 77 at the lower end to 82 at the high end indicating close competition between the top banks.
This surprised me--how can satisfaction be so high when so many banks and financial markets are in trouble? I think the answer lies in the online channel. Banking websites still have an amazing ability to connect with and satisfy customers even faith is not high overall. Customers are able to have a satisfying and fulfilling online banking experience despite what's going on in the markets. This is great news for banks, because it means there is a channel that works and works well.
We can't compare satisfaction year-over-year in the UK (yet), but we can compare between UK and U.S. In other industries we study, there are much larger gaps in satisfaction between the U.S. and UK markets, but in online banking, it's only 3 points (this is comparing top 5 UK banks to an aggregate of satisfaction with all U.S. banks).
Another way to get some context around the number is to compare online industries. The next chart shows how satisfaction with online banking compares to satisfaction with online retail, both in the UK. You can see there is quite a gap, and where satisfaction is higher, financial returns are higher.
Other key findings:
- Adoption of mobile banking is slow. Of survey respondents with a mobile phone, only 15% are aware of mobile banking apps or mobile sites for their bank (by my count, only 2 of the top 5 banks in the UK even havean m.mobile site--Barclays and HSBC--and even those do not appear to have apps. The other three (Santander, RBS, Lloyds) don't have either. Whatever the reason, only 10% of respondents are using their mobile phone to bank.
- UK customers prefer to hear from their bank through the post. When asked their preference for communications from their bank, 42% said they prefer post, 38% prefer email, 11% prefer the website, three% want text messages or mobile alerts, and only five% said they don’t want any communications at all.
- UK customers are not inclined to get social with their banks.When asked if they would like to friend, follow, or like their bank on social media sites like Facebook, 97% said no.
- There is a clear relationship between satisfaction and frequency of website usage. Customers who access their banking website roughly once a month report satisfaction of 71, while customers who access their banking website more than once a day report satisfaction of 89.
- UK customers prefer the website to other channels by a huge margin. When asked which channel they are most satisfied with, 70% said the website (17% said the branch, 10% said the cashpoint, two percent said the call centre, and one percent said mobile banking).
Feel free to use these infographics or leave questions in the comments.
I’m really not following your logic here. “Killer app”, as you described it at the beginning, referred to the app that drove major adoption of a platform. WP and spreadsheets drove major adoption of PCs, and email drove major adoption of the Internet.
So what is online bill payment driving major adoption of? online banking? I know a million people who will disagree with you, if that’s your contention.
It seems to me you’re not talking about “adoption” as much as highlighting the connection between satisfaction and use of online bill payment. And as any good statistician knows (hell, even us bad ones know it), correlation does not mean causality.
It’s just as possible that the most satisfied customers decide to go ahead and go thru the pain of setting up online bill payment with their preferred bank as it is that paying bills online CAUSES a customer to be satisfied.
The use of online bill payment will result in increased satisfaction by the online banking customers. The more bills the pay the more they are satisfied. Higher satisfaction results in better behavior, such as likelihood to buy additional products.
The beauty of the American Customer Satisfaction Index is not only do we get a score upon which to measure, we also get what we call an impact. The impact tells us the causation between the drivers of satisfaction, satisfaction and future behavior of our users.
The argument of causation vs. correlation is a good one, and one that most measurement methodologies don’t address. Fortunately for us, the American Customer Satisfaction Index technology answers that question for us.
-Larry